The Society for Clinical Ophthalmology

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Iridology Is Nonsense!

How useful is this article:

Iridology Is Nonsense!

Author: Stephen Barrett, M.D.

Affiliations:   Quackwatchsm

Summary:   In a recent article published on Quckwatch, Dr Stephen Barrett turns his spotlight on the practice of Iridology (sometimes referred to as iris diagnosis).  Iridology is based on the belief that a persons health can be assessed by the examination of a persons iris. Evidence refutes any claim that Iridology can predict a persons health and well being.

This article is a detailed review of the evidence and any patient considering iridology should be referred to it.  The Society for Clinical Opthlmology endorses Dr Barrett's bottom line which is best left in his words:

"The Bottom Line

Iridology makes no anatomic or physiologic sense. It is not merely worthless. Incorrect diagnoses can unnecessarily frighten people, cause them to waste money seeking medical care for nonexistent conditions, or steer them away from necessary medical care when a real problem is overlooked."

To read the full article from Quackwatchsm please click HERE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (0)Add Comment
Please log in on the left hand side to view comments

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Log in

Become a member here

Translations By Google



Click Our Sponsors

  • Our Sponsors
  • Our Sponsors
  • Our Sponsors
  • Our Sponsors
  • Our Sponsors
  • Our Sponsors