The Society for Clinical Ophthalmology

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

This page has been created in the spirit of freedom of information (or should that be "misinformation"?). Both the good and the bad are published on this website, but at times there can be a need to draw a clear differentiation between the two. Please don't be afraid to speak your mind, the comment facility is always open!

For more of the same in medicine in general, visit Dr Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" site.

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Homeopathy for glaucoma

    6 Comments,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: New stem cell treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity.

    3 Comments,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Are parents 'ignoring eye sun danger'?

    1 Comment,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Teenager receives eyelash transplant

    1 Comment,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Can coloured lenses really help reading?

    9 Comments,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Iridology Is Nonsense!

    0 Comments

  • Eyedrops that “melt away cataracts”

    5 Comments,

  • Experience an eyesight miracle

    0 Comments

  • How the road looks with glaucoma

    4 Comments,

  • Laser treatment saved my sight after conjunctivitis

    2 Comments,



  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Homeopathy for glaucoma

    How useful is this article:

    Homeopathy for glaucoma.

    Members of the UK parliament urge the Government to withdraw NHS funding of homeopathy. 

    Science and Technology Committee carried out an evidence check to test if the Government’s policies on homeopathy were based on sound evidence. The Committee found a mismatch between the evidence and policy in that the evidence base shows that homeopathy is not efficacious and that explanations for why homeopathy would work are scientifically implausible.

    The Committee concluded - given that the existing scientific literature showed no good evidence of efficacy - that further clinical trials of homeopathy could not be justified.  But they have also suggested that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should not allow homeopathic product labels to make medical claims without evidence of efficacy. As they are not medicines, homeopathic products should no longer be licensed by the MHRA.  www.parliament.uk

    While the Government acknowledges there is no evidence that homeopathy works beyond the placebo effect, it does not intend to change or review its policies on NHS funding of homeopathy.  

    Nevertheless claims are still being made for the effectiveness of homeopathy, such as in the treatment of glaucoma, please click HERE.

    We would like to hear your thoughts and experiences of homeopathic treatment of glaucoma or any other eye related disease.

    Please log on or register for free to add a comment.

     

     
    • «
    •  Start 
    •  Prev 
    •  1 
    •  2 
    •  Next 
    •  End 
    • »


    Page 1 of 2

    Log in

    Become a member here

    Translations By Google