The Society for Clinical Ophthalmology

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Separating evidence from anecdote and quackery

This page has been created in the spirit of freedom of information (or should that be "misinformation"?). Both the good and the bad are published on this website, but at times there can be a need to draw a clear differentiation between the two. Please don't be afraid to speak your mind, the comment facility is always open!

For more of the same in medicine in general, visit Dr Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" site.

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Homeopathy for glaucoma

    6 Comments,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: New stem cell treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity.

    3 Comments,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Are parents 'ignoring eye sun danger'?

    1 Comment,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Teenager receives eyelash transplant

    1 Comment,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Can coloured lenses really help reading?

    9 Comments,

  • BAD OPHTHALMOLOGY?: Iridology Is Nonsense!

    0 Comments

  • Eyedrops that “melt away cataracts”

    5 Comments,

  • Experience an eyesight miracle

    0 Comments

  • How the road looks with glaucoma

    4 Comments,

  • Laser treatment saved my sight after conjunctivitis

    2 Comments,





  • Log in

    Become a member here

    Translations By Google



    Click Our Sponsors

    • Our Sponsors
    • Our Sponsors
    • Our Sponsors
    • Our Sponsors
    • Our Sponsors
    • Our Sponsors